Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 16:56:37 +0900 From: poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp To: sindrome <sindrome@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why does Samba requires 777 permissions on /tmp Message-ID: <8661yedqyy.wl%poyopoyo@puripuri.plala.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <CAFzAeSdgRotc34%2BeyfVHZBA-QGUCWJ1MZDYw1ysRxEV9MhG2BQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFzAeSdgRotc34%2BeyfVHZBA-QGUCWJ1MZDYw1ysRxEV9MhG2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Sat, 18 May 2013 18:34:47 -0500, sindrome wrote: > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools/pkgtools.rb:483: warning: > Insecure world writable dir /tmp in PATH, mode 040777 At Sun, 19 May 2013 23:31:21 -0500, sindrome wrote: > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools/pkgtools.rb:483: warning: > Insecure world writable dir /tmp/. in PATH, mode 041777 At Sun, 19 May 2013 21:30:03 +0200, Simon Wright wrote: > /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgtools/pkgtools.rb:288: warning: > Insecure world writable dir /tmp/ in PATH, mode 041777 /tmp /tmp/. /tmp/ Interesting three different messages. It looks like three different entities adds their own value to your PATH. What you guys should do first is to find who sets stupid PATH for you. I don't suppose portupgrade does.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8661yedqyy.wl%poyopoyo>